Politics
Rivers State in Crisis: Alleged N400bn Misappropriation by Sole Administrator Sparks Senate Probe and Threatens Peace Process

Post Links
Rivers State, Nigeria’s oil and gas hub, is no stranger to political turbulence. However, recent allegations of fund misappropriation by the state’s Sole Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.), have thrust the region into a new wave of controversy. Reports claim that a staggering N400 billion remains unaccounted for, prompting the Nigerian Senate to establish an 18-member committee to oversee and investigate the administrator’s financial dealings. This blog post delves into the details of these allegations, the Senate’s response, and the broader implications for the peace process in Rivers State. With the state already grappling with a political crisis and a state of emergency, the stakes couldn’t be higher.
UK Tiktok Creation Blueprint with Monetization tips and Coaching – How to create a U.K. tiktok account

The Context: Rivers State’s Political Crisis and the Sole Administrator
In March 2025, President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency in Rivers State, suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and the State House of Assembly. This unprecedented move followed escalating political tensions, primarily between Fubara and Federal Capital Territory Minister Nyesom Wike, which threatened to destabilize the state. Vice Admiral Ibas was appointed as the Sole Administrator to restore order, stabilize the political environment, and prepare for the restoration of democratic governance.
Ibas’s mandate was clear: prioritize peace and avoid partisan politics. However, just weeks into his tenure, allegations surfaced that he had failed to account for N400 billion in state funds. These claims, widely circulated on platforms like X, have raised questions about transparency and accountability in Rivers State’s governance.
The Allegations: N400 Billion Unaccounted For
According to reports, the fund misappropriation allegations center on the Sole Administrator’s inability to provide a clear account of how N400 billion was spent. Sources, including posts on X, suggest that this financial discrepancy is one of the largest in Rivers State’s recent history, fueling accusations of mismanagement or even corruption.
The lack of transparency has drawn sharp criticism from civil society groups, political analysts, and residents. For instance, the Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) and other civil society organizations in Rivers State have condemned the Sole Administrator’s spending, arguing that he lacks the constitutional authority to disburse state funds without an approved budget. They have threatened legal action to halt what they describe as “unlawful spending.”
Moreover, the decision to nullify procurement contracts since February 28, 2028, and order public servants to refund contractors has sparked further controversy. Critics argue that this retrospective order could lead to a wave of bad loans, litigation, and economic uncertainty, further straining Rivers State’s economy.
The Senate’s Response: A Committee to Probe and Oversee
In response to these allegations, the Nigerian Senate, led by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, constituted an 18-member Senate Committee on May 6, 2025, to oversee the activities of the Sole Administrator and investigate the financial discrepancies. The committee’s mandate includes ensuring transparency, accountability, and adherence to constitutional provisions in Rivers State’s governance.
The establishment of the committee follows earlier interventions by the House of Representatives, which formed a 21-member ad-hoc committee to oversee the state’s affairs, including the activities of the Sole Administrator and the defunct State House of Assembly. However, these interventions have not been without controversy. Legal experts, such as Obioma Ezenwobodo, have criticized the National Assembly’s actions, arguing that they overstep constitutional boundaries and abet an “illegal” Sole Administrator.
The Senate Committee’s probe is expected to focus on several key areas:
- Financial Accountability: Investigating the alleged N400 billion misappropriation and examining the Sole Administrator’s expenditure records.
- Compliance with Constitutional Mandates: Ensuring that Ibas’s actions align with his role as a neutral peacemaker rather than a partisan figure.
- Impact on Governance: Assessing how these allegations affect the state’s ability to function under emergency rule.
The committee’s findings could have far-reaching implications, not only for Ibas but also for the broader political landscape in Rivers State.
Implications of the Allegations: A Threat to Stability
If the allegations of fund misappropriation are proven true, the consequences for Rivers State could be profound, particularly in the context of its fragile peace process. Below, we explore the potential impacts:
- Erosion of Public Trust:
The allegations have already sparked widespread skepticism about the Sole Administrator’s leadership. Political analyst Liborous Oshoma has described Ibas’s actions, such as appointing local government administrators despite a court order, as improper and undemocratic. Public trust in governance is critical in a state under emergency rule, and these allegations could further alienate residents, making it harder to achieve political harmony. - Economic Fallout:
Rivers State’s economy is already strained by the state of emergency, which has stalled new projects and disrupted policy initiation. The nullification of contracts and the ensuing litigation could exacerbate economic uncertainty, discourage investment, and create a generation of bad loans. This economic instability could fuel unrest, undermining efforts to restore peace. - Deepening Political Divisions:
The political crisis in Rivers State, driven by the feud between Wike and Fubara, remains unresolved. The allegations against Ibas risk exacerbating these divisions, as factions align to either defend or criticize the Sole Administrator. For instance, the Rivers State APC has called for a probe into Fubara’s administration, further polarizing the political landscape. Without a neutral and transparent administration, the peace process could collapse, leading to prolonged instability. - Legal and Constitutional Challenges:
The Sole Administrator’s actions have already prompted legal challenges, with civil society groups threatening to sue over unauthorized spending. Additionally, critics argue that the state of emergency itself is unconstitutional, as it lacks the two-thirds majority approval required by the Constitution. A protracted legal battle could delay the restoration of democratic governance, further complicating the peace process. - Setback to the Peace Process:
The National Civil Society Council of Nigeria has called for an independent Truth and Reconciliation Committee to address the root causes of Rivers State’s crisis. However, the allegations against Ibas could undermine such efforts. If the Sole Administrator is perceived as partisan or corrupt, stakeholders may be reluctant to engage in dialogue, stalling reconciliation efforts.
The Peace Process: Can It Survive?
The peace process in Rivers State hinges on restoring trust, fostering dialogue, and ensuring accountability. The allegations against the Sole Administrator threaten all three pillars. To salvage the process, several steps are necessary:
- Transparent Investigation: The Senate Committee must conduct a thorough and impartial probe into the alleged fund misappropriation. Publicizing the findings will be crucial to rebuilding trust.
- Neutral Leadership: Ibas must demonstrate neutrality and focus on his mandate to restore order rather than engaging in actions perceived as partisan, such as appointing local government administrators.
- Stakeholder Engagement: The proposed Truth and Reconciliation Committee should be established promptly, comprising respected elder statesmen and neutral figures to mediate between conflicting parties.
- Economic Stabilization: The Sole Administrator should work with the National Assembly to address economic concerns, such as stalled projects and bad loans, to prevent further unrest.
- Judicial Oversight: Courts must resolve legal challenges swiftly to provide clarity on the constitutionality of the state of emergency and the Sole Administrator’s actions.
Conclusion: A Critical Juncture for Rivers State
The allegations of fund misappropriation by Rivers State’s Sole Administrator have cast a dark shadow over the state’s governance and its fragile peace process. The Senate Committee’s probe represents a critical opportunity to restore transparency and accountability, but its success depends on impartiality and thoroughness. If the allegations are substantiated, the fallout could deepen economic woes, erode public trust, and derail efforts to resolve Rivers State’s political crisis.
For residents, the stakes are personal. Rivers State is not just a political battleground; it’s home to millions who deserve peace, stability, and accountable governance. As the Senate Committee begins its work, all eyes are on Rivers State, a region at a crossroads between chaos and reconciliation.
What are your thoughts on the allegations against the Rivers State Sole Administrator? How do you think the Senate Committee’s probe will impact the peace process? Share your views in the comments below, and subscribe to our newsletter for updates on this developing story.
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Politics
Nigeria’s Tax Reform Bills 2025: Akpabio’s Senate Passes Landmark Legislation for Economic Transformation

Post Links
A New Era for Nigeria’s Tax System
On May 7, 2025, the Nigerian Senate, under the leadership of Senate President Godswill Akpabio, passed two of the four Tax Reform Bills proposed by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, marking a pivotal moment in Nigeria’s economic reform journey. These bills, including the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill and the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, aim to overhaul the nation’s outdated tax system, enhance revenue generation, and promote equitable wealth distribution.
The remaining two bills, the Nigeria Tax Bill and the Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Bill, were slated for further deliberation, with the Senate demonstrating a commitment to thorough legislative scrutiny. This historic passage, announced by Akpabio after robust debates and public hearings, has sparked widespread discussions about its implications for governance, economic growth, and public welfare.
The reforms come at a time when Nigeria faces dwindling oil revenues and rising demands for infrastructure, education, and security. Akpabio has described the bills as “the future of Nigeria,” emphasizing their role in modernizing fiscal policies to meet 21st-century challenges. However, public opinion remains divided, with some praising the bills’ potential to drive sustainable growth, while others express concerns over transparency and implementation. In this blog post, we will explore the details of the Tax Reform Bills, their significance for Nigeria’s economy, public sentiments, and the Senate’s approach under Akpabio’s leadership.
Overview of the Tax Reform Bills
The four Tax Reform Bills, introduced to the National Assembly by President Tinubu on October 3, 2024, are designed to comprehensively restructure Nigeria’s tax framework. The bills passed on May 7, 2025, include:
- Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill: This bill establishes the Nigeria Revenue Service (NRS) to replace the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS). The NRS will serve as the primary agency for federal tax collection, led by a board chairperson appointed by the President and an executive vice chairperson confirmed by the Senate. The structure includes six executive directors representing Nigeria’s geopolitical zones, ensuring regional balance. The bill aims to streamline tax collection and improve efficiency.
- Nigeria Tax Administration Bill: This legislation focuses on standardizing tax administration processes across federal, state, and local governments. It seeks to simplify compliance, reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks, and enhance accountability in tax collection and distribution.
The remaining two bills, the Nigeria Tax Bill and the Joint Revenue Board (Establishment) Bill, are expected to provide a fiscal framework for taxation and establish a coordinating body for revenue agencies, respectively. The Senate, under Akpabio’s guidance, has prioritized public engagement, holding hearings to address concerns and incorporate stakeholder input.
UK Tiktok Creation Blueprint with Monetization tips and Coaching – How to create a U.K. tiktok account

Importance of the Tax Reform Bills
The passage of the Tax Reform Bills is a critical step toward addressing Nigeria’s economic challenges. Below are the key reasons why these bills are significant:
- Modernizing Nigeria’s Tax System: Akpabio has repeatedly noted that less than 30% of Nigerians pay taxes, yet citizens expect world-class infrastructure and services. The bills aim to expand the tax base, reduce reliance on volatile oil revenues, and create a progressive tax system that aligns with global standards. By replacing the FIRS with the NRS, the government seeks to enhance efficiency and transparency in tax collection.
- Equitable Revenue Distribution: The Nigeria Tax Administration Bill emphasizes fair distribution of tax burdens, ensuring that wealthier individuals and corporations contribute proportionately. This approach is expected to reduce income inequality and fund critical sectors like healthcare, education, and agriculture, fostering inclusive growth.
- Boosting Economic Transformation: The bills are designed to generate more revenue to support Nigeria’s ambitious development goals. Akpabio has stated that the reforms will place Nigeria “on the pedestal of advanced economies” by improving infrastructure and economic ecosystems. Stakeholders, including the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), have endorsed the bills, recommending minor adjustments to enhance their impact.
- Enhancing Governance and Accountability: The establishment of the NRS and standardized tax administration processes will reduce leakages and improve accountability. The Senate’s rigorous scrutiny, including the formation of an ad-hoc committee chaired by Senator Sani Musa, reflects a commitment to ensuring the bills serve the public interest.
- Responding to Global Economic Shifts: With declining oil revenues, Nigeria must diversify its income sources. The Tax Reform Bills encourage innovation in revenue generation, aligning with President Tinubu’s broader economic reforms, such as the Renewed Hope Agenda.
Public Opinion: A Mixed Reception
Public opinion on the Tax Reform Bills is polarized, reflecting both optimism and skepticism. Below is an analysis of the sentiments expressed across media, stakeholder engagements, and social platforms like X:
- Support from Stakeholders: Key institutions, including the Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) and ICAN, have backed the bills, citing their potential to modernize Nigeria’s fiscal landscape. The Situation Room on Economic Reforms, a coalition of 100 civil society organizations, praised the Senate’s transparent public hearings, noting that they demonstrated a commitment to inclusivity. Barrister Johnson Alli, a coalition representative, highlighted the bills’ role in improving governance and tax equity.
- Concerns Over Transparency and Impact: Despite the Senate’s efforts, some Nigerians, including governors and traditional rulers, have expressed reservations. The Nigerian Governors Forum has called for adjustments to ensure the bills do not disproportionately burden certain regions. Critics argue that the reforms may increase living costs for ordinary citizens if not implemented carefully. Akpabio has acknowledged these concerns, urging detractors to participate in public hearings rather than relying on “social media misinformation.”
- Social Media Debates: Posts on X reflect a divide, with some users praising Akpabio’s leadership and the bills’ potential to drive economic transformation, while others question the timing and clarity of the reforms. For instance, a post by @ParallelFacts on May 8, 2025, quoted Akpabio saying the bills are “in the interest of Nigerians,” garnering both supportive and critical comments. Misinformation has been a challenge, with Akpabio dismissing “garbage in, garbage out” narratives on social media.
- Calls for Inclusivity: Akpabio has emphasized that the Senate will not “betray the trust of Nigerians,” promising to incorporate feedback from all stakeholders, including those opposed to the bills. The public hearings, attended by government officials, private sector leaders, and civil society, have been lauded for fostering dialogue. However, some citizens feel the process could be more accessible, with calls for online platforms to gather broader input.
Akpabio’s Leadership and the Senate’s Approach
Senate President Godswill Akpabio has been a central figure in navigating the complexities of the Tax Reform Bills. His leadership has been characterized by a balance of firmness and openness to dialogue. Key aspects of his approach include:
- Commitment to Public Engagement: Akpabio has championed public hearings, inviting governors, traditional rulers, NGOs, and citizens to contribute. He has stressed the importance of informed discussions, criticizing opponents who “have not even seen the content of these bills” before attacking them.
- Bipartisan Leadership: Despite controversies, including a dismissed sexual harassment petition and misinformation about his statements, Akpabio has maintained bipartisan support. The Senate’s vote of confidence in him on March 20, 2025, underscores his ability to unify lawmakers across party lines.
- Focus on Economic Urgency: Akpabio has framed the bills as a response to Nigeria’s economic challenges, including insecurity and dwindling oil revenues. His call for lawmakers to address “the bleeding wounds of the republic” reflects a sense of urgency in passing transformative legislation.
- Collaboration with Experts: The Senate engaged tax experts to educate lawmakers and the public, addressing misconceptions and building consensus. Akpabio commended Deputy Senate President Jibrin Barau and House Speaker Tajudeen Abbas for facilitating these briefings.
Challenges and Future Outlook
While the Tax Reform Bills hold immense potential, their success depends on effective implementation and public buy-in. Challenges include:
- Misinformation and Resistance: The Senate must continue combating misinformation, as social media narratives have fueled opposition. Akpabio’s call for stakeholders to “read the bills” is a step toward transparency, but broader public education campaigns are needed.
- Regional Sensitivities: The Nigerian Governors Forum’s concerns highlight the need for regional balance in tax policies. The Senate’s ad-hoc committee is tasked with harmonizing these perspectives to ensure fairness.
- Implementation Capacity: The transition from FIRS to NRS and the standardization of tax administration requires robust institutional frameworks. The Senate’s oversight role will be crucial in ensuring accountability.
Looking ahead, the Senate plans to harmonize the passed bills with the House of Representatives’ versions and deliberate on the remaining two bills. Once all four bills are approved, they will be transmitted to President Tinubu for assent, potentially ushering in a new era of fiscal discipline and economic transformation.
Conclusion: Shaping Nigeria’s Economic Future
The passage of the Tax Reform Bills by the Nigerian Senate, led by Godswill Akpabio, is a landmark achievement that signals Nigeria’s commitment to modernizing its tax system and driving economic transformation. By establishing the Nigeria Revenue Service and streamlining tax administration, the bills address long-standing fiscal challenges and pave the way for equitable growth. Despite mixed public opinion, the Senate’s inclusive approach, marked by public hearings and expert consultations, reflects a dedication to serving Nigerians.
As the nation awaits the finalization of the remaining bills, the focus must shift to transparent implementation and public education to build trust. Akpabio’s leadership has positioned the Senate as a proactive force in Nigeria’s reform agenda, and the Tax Reform Bills could be a game-changer for the country’s economic future. For Nigerians, this is an opportunity to engage constructively, ensuring that the reforms deliver on their promise of a stronger, more prosperous nation.
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Politics
President Tinubu’s Historic Visit to Anambra State: Commissioning Landmark Projects and Strengthening Regional Development

Post Links
A Milestone in Anambra’s Development Journey
On May 8, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu made a historic visit to Anambra State, marking his first official trip to the state since assuming office on May 29, 2023. This visit was not just a ceremonial event but a significant moment that underscored the federal government’s commitment to fostering development in Nigeria’s South-East region.
Accompanied by a high-profile entourage, including National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu, Minister of Works Dave Umahi, and governors from Ogun, Imo, and Enugu states, President Tinubu commissioned several transformative projects spearheaded by Anambra State Governor, Professor Chukwuma Charles Soludo. These projects, ranging from the new Anambra State Government House to the Solution Fun City, symbolize the state’s audacious vision to become a hub of enterprise and innovation.
UK Tiktok Creation Blueprint with Monetization tips and Coaching – How to create a U.K. tiktok account

Governor Soludo’s administration has been lauded for its infrastructural strides, and Tinubu’s visit highlighted the synergy between federal and state leadership in driving progress. During the visit, Soludo made a notable remark, pointing out that the last presidential visit to Anambra in 2012 was to “commission a brewery and another private enterprise.” This statement sparked discussions, as it subtly contrasted the scale and public impact of past visits with the monumental public infrastructure projects commissioned in 2025. In this blog post, we will explore the significance of Tinubu’s visit, detail the projects commissioned, clarify Soludo’s brewery comment, and analyze the broader implications for Anambra State and the South-East.
The Significance of Tinubu’s Visit to Anambra State
Tinubu’s visit to Anambra State was a landmark event for several reasons. First, it was the first time in over a decade that a Nigerian president visited the state to commission public infrastructure projects, signaling a renewed focus on the South-East’s development. Governor Soludo emphasized this during his welcome address, describing the visit as “historic and consequential” and a testament to the cordial relationship between his administration and the federal government, despite their differing political affiliations (Soludo belongs to APGA, while Tinubu is APC).
The visit also showcased Anambra’s progress under Soludo’s leadership. Since taking office, Soludo has prioritized infrastructure, education, healthcare, and security, aligning with his vision to transform Anambra into the “Silicon Valley and Dubai of Africa.” Tinubu’s presence validated these efforts, with the president praising Soludo as a “visionary leader” and “solution provider” who is placing Anambra State on the path of 21st-century development. This endorsement not only boosts Soludo’s political capital but also positions Anambra State as an attractive destination for investment, a key goal of the 2024 Anambra Investment Summit held earlier.
Moreover, the visit fostered regional cooperation. The presence of governors from neighboring South-East states, such as Enugu’s Peter Mbah and Imo’s Hope Uzodimma, highlighted the collective push for development in the region. Tinubu’s recent signing of the South-East Development Commission bill further complements these efforts, aiming to address infrastructural and ecological challenges in the region. By commissioning Soludo’s projects, Tinubu demonstrated a commitment to inclusive governance, reinforcing the narrative that his administration prioritizes national unity and equitable growth.
Key Projects Commissioned During the Visit
President Tinubu commissioned several landmark projects during his visit, each reflecting Soludo’s commitment to modernizing Anambra’s infrastructure and improving governance. Below is a detailed overview of the major projects unveiled:
- New Anambra State Government House: For over 30 years since Anambra’s creation, the state lacked an official government house, relying on makeshift facilities. Soludo’s administration broke this jinx by constructing a modern Government House Mini-City, complete with a Presidential Lodge and administrative facilities. Tinubu, while commissioning the project, described infrastructure as the “backbone of development” and praised Soludo for delivering “environmentally responsive governance.”
- Solution Fun City: This ultra-modern recreational facility in Awka is designed to enhance tourism and provide residents with world-class leisure options. It symbolizes Soludo’s vision of blending infrastructure with lifestyle improvements, making Anambra State a livable and attractive state.
- New Governor’s Lodge and Presidential Lodge: Built for the first time in 34 years, the new Governor’s Lodge addresses a long-standing gap in the state’s governance infrastructure. The accompanying Presidential Lodge ensures that visiting dignitaries, like Tinubu, are hosted in facilities befitting their status.
- Emeka Anyaoku Center at Nnamdi Azikiwe University: Named after the former Commonwealth Secretary-General, this institute for international studies and diplomacy enhances Anambra’s educational landscape and positions the state as a hub for knowledge and global engagement. Tinubu visited the university to exchange pleasantries with its management, underscoring the project’s significance.
- 8-Lane Aroma-Government House Boulevard and Other Infrastructure: The boulevard, along with the Tower of Light and Monument of Heroes, represents the “audacity of Anambra’s dreams,” as Soludo described. These projects improve connectivity, enhance the state’s aesthetics, and honor its historical figures. Additionally, Tinubu was set to commission the Ekwulobia flyover and numerous strategic roads, further boosting Anambra’s infrastructure.
These projects are part of a broader portfolio that includes over 500 km of roads, flyovers, bridges, five new general hospitals, world-class trauma centers, smart schools, water projects, new markets, and bus terminals, many of which are awaiting commissioning. Soludo’s focus on infrastructure aligns with his 50-year master plan to transform Anambra into a global economic powerhouse, and Tinubu’s visit amplified the visibility of these achievements.
Clarifying Soludo’s Brewery Comment
Governor Soludo’s statement that the last presidential visit to Anambra in 2012 was to commission a brewery and another private enterprise stirred some controversy, particularly as it referenced the tenure of former Governor Peter Obi. To clarify, Soludo was highlighting the contrast between the private-sector focus of the 2012 visit and the public infrastructure focus of Tinubu’s 2025 visit. News reports confirm that in 2012, then-President Goodluck Jonathan visited Anambra to commission a brewery (likely the Hero Beer Company) and another private project, with no major public infrastructure projects on the agenda.
Soludo’s remark was not a direct criticism of Obi but a rhetorical device to underscore the significance of Tinubu’s visit, which centered on transformative public projects like the Government House and Solution Fun City. By noting that it had been 13 years since a president visited for such a purpose, Soludo emphasized the rarity and importance of the occasion. This context is crucial to avoid misinterpretations, as the comment sparked debates on social media, with some interpreting it as a jab at Obi’s legacy.
Broader Implications for Anambra State and the South-East
Tinubu’s Anambra State visit has far-reaching implications for the state and the South-East region. Economically, the commissioned projects enhance Anambra’s appeal to investors, aligning with the goals of the Anambra State Investment Promotion and Protection Agency (ANSIPPA). The state’s improved infrastructure, including roads, healthcare facilities, and recreational centers, creates a conducive environment for businesses and tourism.
Politically, the visit strengthens the partnership between Soludo and Tinubu, despite their different party affiliations. Tinubu’s appointment of Soludo to the Presidential Economic Team reflects this trust, and the visit further cements their collaboration. This relationship could unlock more federal support for Anambra, including funding for ongoing and future projects.
Regionally, the visit aligns with Tinubu’s broader commitment to South-East development, as evidenced by his recent project commissioning in Enugu and the South-East Development Commission. Soludo and Enugu’s Peter Mbah have both praised Tinubu’s inclusive leadership, suggesting a unified push for regional progress.
Conclusion: A New Chapter for Anambra
President Tinubu’s visit to Anambra State on May 8, 2025, was a defining moment that celebrated the state’s infrastructural achievements and reinforced its role in Nigeria’s development narrative. By commissioning projects like the new Government House, Solution Fun City, and the Emeka Anyaoku Center, Tinubu and Soludo showcased a shared vision for progress. Soludo’s brewery comment, while sparking debate, highlighted the unprecedented scale of public-focused projects commissioned during the visit, distinguishing it from past presidential engagements.
As Anambra State continues its journey toward becoming a hub of enterprise and innovation, Tinubu’s visit serves as a catalyst for further growth. It underscores the power of federal-state collaboration and sets a precedent for inclusive governance. For residents, investors, and observers, the message is clear: Anambra State is on the rise, and with leaders like Soludo at the helm, the state’s future is brighter than ever.
Share your thoughts on Tinubu’s Anambra State visit and Soludo’s projects in the comments below, and let’s continue the conversation about Nigeria’s path to progress!
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Politics
NANS Factional President’s Shocking Apology to Seyi Tinubu: Unraveling the DSS Detention Drama

Post Links
A Viral Video Sparks Controversy
The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) has long been a powerful voice for Nigerian youth, but recent events have thrust the organization into a storm of controversy. Atiku Abubakar Isah, a factional president of NANS, made headlines when a viral video surfaced, accusing Seyi Tinubu, son of President Bola Tinubu, of orchestrating his abduction, torture, and offering a N100 million bribe to support the Tinubu administration. The allegations sent shockwaves across Nigeria, igniting debates about political interference and student leadership autonomy.
However, in a dramatic turn of events, Isah issued a public apology to Seyi Tinubu, retracting his claims while allegedly under detention by the Department of State Services (DSS). This blog post delves into the saga, exploring what transpired, the role of DSS detention, potential foul play, and the public’s reaction to this unfolding drama.
The Viral Video: Atiku Isah’s Explosive Allegations
On April 30, 2025, Atiku Abubakar Isah held a press conference in Abuja, claiming he had been elected NANS president during a February 27 convention. In a viral video, he accused Seyi Tinubu and the Minister of Youth Development, Ayodele Olawande, of offering him a N100 million bribe to promote President Tinubu’s administration. Isah alleged that after rejecting the bribe, he was abducted on April 15, stripped naked, and brutally beaten by thugs acting on Seyi’s orders. He further claimed that Seyi disrupted his inauguration ceremony in Abuja with armed thugs and threatened his life, warning that any harm to him would be covered up by powerful forces.
The video, widely shared on platforms like X, sparked outrage among Nigerians, with many viewing it as evidence of political overreach by the first family. Prominent figures, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Labour Party’s Peter Obi, condemned the alleged intimidation, calling for accountability. The accusations painted Seyi Tinubu as a power-hungry figure meddling in student affairs, threatening the independence of NANS.
Seyi Tinubu’s Swift Rebuttal
Seyi Tinubu wasted no time responding to the allegations. On May 2, 2025, he took to Instagram, dismissing Isah’s claims as “completely fictional” and defamatory. He denied ever meeting Isah, orchestrating any violence, or interfering in NANS activities. Seyi’s camp, including groups like the City Boy Movement and Afenifere, labeled the accusations as politically motivated, suggesting that Isah was sponsored by opposition figures like Atiku Abubakar and Rotimi Amaechi to tarnish the Tinubu family’s image ahead of the 2027 elections.
UK Tiktok Creation Blueprint with Monetization tips and Coaching – How to create a U.K. tiktok account

The rebuttal was bolstered by supporters, including the Olushola Oladoja-led NANS faction, which dismissed Isah as an “impostor” and insisted that Oladoja was the legitimate president. The National Association of Polytechnic Students and the South-East Youth Stakeholders Council also defended Seyi, accusing Isah of blackmail and demanding a public apology.
DSS Detention: A Turning Point
The narrative took a dramatic shift when reports emerged that Atiku Isah was detained by the DSS on April 29, 2025, just days after his press conference. According to posts on X, Isah was held for over a week, with allegations that he was coerced into retracting his statements. On May 7, 2025, Isah released an apology letter to Seyi Tinubu, retracting his claims and admitting that he was “fed lies” by political rivals. He clarified that Seyi was not involved in his alleged abduction, the N100 million bribe, or the disruption of his inauguration.
The timing and circumstances of the apology letter raised eyebrows. Nigerians on X and other platforms speculated that Isah’s detention by the DSS was not a routine investigation but a deliberate move to pressure him into recanting. Reports suggested that Isah was held incommunicado, with limited access to legal representation, fueling suspicions of foul play. The DSS has not officially commented on the detention, but the lack of transparency has led many to question whether Isah’s apology was genuine or coerced.
What Transpired in DSS Custody? Signs of Foul Play
While concrete evidence of coercion remains scarce, several factors point to potential foul play during Isah’s DSS detention:
- Timing of the Apology: Isah’s apology came just days after his detention, suggesting that his time in custody may have influenced his decision to retract his claims. The swift reversal from bold accusations to an unreserved apology raised suspicions of external pressure.
- Public Sentiment on X: Posts on X highlighted concerns that Isah was “forced” to apologize, with users pointing to the DSS’s history of detaining critics of the government. One user described Seyi Tinubu as “dangerous” and accused him of using state machinery to silence dissent.
- Lack of Transparency: The DSS’s failure to provide details about Isah’s detention, including the reasons for his arrest or the conditions of his confinement, has fueled speculation. Human rights groups have called for an investigation into whether Isah was subjected to intimidation or torture.
- Isah’s Physical Condition: Prior to his detention, Isah shared images of bruises, claiming they were from his alleged abduction. While no new images have surfaced post-detention, the timing of his apology suggests he may have been under duress to avoid further harm.
- Political Context: The accusations against Seyi Tinubu align with broader political tensions, with opposition figures like Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi leveraging the saga to criticize the Tinubu administration. The DSS’s involvement could be seen as an attempt to protect the first family’s image ahead of the 2027 elections.
While these factors do not conclusively prove foul play, they collectively paint a troubling picture. The lack of an independent investigation into Isah’s detention leaves room for speculation, with many Nigerians questioning the integrity of the process.
The Apology Letter: A Closer Look
In his apology letter, posted on May 7, 2025, Isah expressed regret for his “false and defamatory” statements, claiming he was misled by political actors. He specifically retracted claims that Seyi Tinubu sent thugs to disrupt his inauguration or offered a N100 million bribe. Isah also dismissed warnings from the Olushola Oladoja-led NANS faction that Seyi could orchestrate his killing, calling them baseless. The letter was shared widely on X, with some praising Isah for “setting the record straight,” while others viewed it as a coerced capitulation.
The apology has not quelled the controversy. Critics argue that Isah’s retraction does little to address the underlying issues of political interference in NANS and the use of state institutions to silence dissent. The letter’s formal tone and lack of personal detail have further fueled speculation that it was drafted under pressure.
Public Reactions: A Divided Nation
The saga has polarized Nigerians, with reactions on X and other platforms reflecting deep divisions:
- Skeptics and Critics: Many Nigerians, particularly opposition supporters, believe Isah’s apology was coerced. Posts on X expressed outrage, with users accusing Seyi Tinubu of abusing his influence and the DSS of acting as a tool of the ruling elite. One user warned that Seyi’s alleged actions could harm his rumored 2027 Lagos governorship bid.
- Supporters of Seyi Tinubu: Tinubu’s allies, including the City Boy Movement and the South-East Youth Stakeholders Council, hailed the apology as vindication. They argued that Isah’s initial claims were part of a smear campaign orchestrated by political opponents. Some praised Seyi’s restraint and called for legal action against Isah for defamation.
- Neutral Observers: Some Nigerians called for an independent investigation to uncover the truth. They expressed concern over the DSS’s role and the broader implications for freedom of speech and student activism. Others urged NANS to resolve its internal leadership disputes to prevent further exploitation by politicians.
The controversy has also reignited debates about the autonomy of student organizations like NANS, with many questioning whether they can remain independent in Nigeria’s highly politicized landscape.
Implications for NANS and Nigerian Politics
The Atiku Isah-Seyi Tinubu saga underscores deeper issues within NANS and Nigerian politics. The organization’s factional disputes have made it vulnerable to external influence, with rival groups accusing each other of aligning with political actors. Isah’s detention and apology highlight the risks faced by student leaders who challenge powerful figures, raising questions about the state’s commitment to free expression.
For Seyi Tinubu, the controversy has both damaged and bolstered his public image. While his supporters see him as a victim of political sabotage, critics view the incident as evidence of his undue influence. As rumors of his 2027 governorship ambition grow, this saga could shape public perceptions of his leadership style and political alliances.
Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale
The story of the NANS factional president’s viral video, DSS detention, and subsequent apology to Seyi Tinubu is a cautionary tale of power, politics, and pressure in Nigeria. Atiku Isah’s accusations, followed by his swift retraction under questionable circumstances, highlight the challenges of speaking truth to power in a polarized society. While the truth behind his detention may never be fully uncovered, the public’s reaction reflects a broader demand for transparency and accountability.
As Nigerians continue to grapple with this saga, one thing is clear: the intersection of student activism and political influence remains a contentious battleground. Whether Isah’s apology marks the end of this drama or the beginning of a larger reckoning, only time will tell.
What are your thoughts on Atiku Isah’s apology and the DSS’s role in this controversy? Share your views in the comments below and subscribe for more updates on Nigerian politics and student activism!
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
-
Politics2 days ago
DSS Detains NANS President Atiku Isah – Seyi Tinubu Allegations Uncovered
-
Entertainment4 days ago
7 Nigerian Celebrities Born Into Wealth Who Carved Their Own Paths to Stardom
-
Politics4 days ago
VeryDarkMan’s Arrest Sparks Outrage: Why Nigerians Are Boycotting GTBank Over EFCC Drama
-
Politics4 days ago
The Collapse of the Fubara-Wike Peace Accord and the Looming Crisis Amid State of Emergency
-
Education3 days ago
JAMB 2025 Results Reveal Mass Failure: What It Means for Nigeria’s Education Quality
-
People2 days ago
Nnamdi Kanu Case: Court’s Admission of Evidence Shakes Nigeria’s Legal Landscape
-
Politics4 days ago
VeryDarkMan’s Arrest by EFCC: Cyberstalking Charges Revealed as Court Date Looms
-
Business4 days ago
DStv Weekly Subscription Plan in Nigeria: A Game-Changer for Flexible Entertainment