Politics
VeryDarkMan’s Arrest by EFCC: Cyberstalking Charges Revealed as Court Date Looms
Post Links
The Controversy Surrounding VeryDarkMan’s Arrest
Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, has become a polarizing figure in Nigeria’s social media landscape. Renowned for his outspoken criticism of public figures and institutions, VeryDarkMan has garnered a massive following while also attracting legal troubles. His recent arrest by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on May 2, 2025, has sparked widespread debate, with fans, critics, and human rights advocates weighing in. After days of speculation, the EFCC has disclosed the reason behind VeryDarkMan’s detention: allegations of cyberstalking. The agency has confirmed that court charges are imminent, marking a significant escalation in this high-profile case. This blog post delves into the details of VeryDarkMan’s arrest, the EFCC’s stated charges, and what lies ahead as the social media influencer prepares to face the law.
The Arrest: What Happened?
On May 2, 2025, VeryDarkMan was apprehended by EFCC operatives shortly after visiting a Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB) branch in Garki, Abuja, alongside his mother, Blessing Otse, and associate, Steven Avuara (aka C-Pack). The trio had gone to the bank to address suspicious deductions from Mrs. Otse’s account, which VeryDarkMan had publicly highlighted in a video posted online. According to his legal team, led by Deji Adeyanju, the arrest was dramatic and allegedly involved physical assault, blindfolding, and threats from EFCC officers, who reportedly labeled VeryDarkMan a “bandit.”
The arrest raised questions as the EFCC initially remained silent on the specific allegations. VeryDarkMan’s lawyer and supporters, including human rights activist Omoyele Sowore, condemned the detention as an attempt to silence the influencer for his relentless criticism of the EFCC and its leadership. Sowore argued that the agency lacked the legal mandate to prosecute cases like defamation or cybercrime, which are typically civil matters. Meanwhile, the whereabouts of VeryDarkMan’s mother remain unknown, adding fuel to the controversy.
EFCC Breaks Silence: Cyberstalking Charges
On May 5, 2025, the EFCC clarified the reason for VeryDarkMan’s detention. Speaking to BBC News Pidgin, EFCC spokesperson Dele Oyewale revealed that the social media critic was arrested due to multiple petitions accusing him of cyberstalking. Oyewale stated, “We arrested him to respond to a series of allegations raised against him by some petitioners. We will release him when he meets the bail conditions, and we will take the case to court as soon as possible.”
UK Tiktok Creation Blueprint with Monetization tips and Coaching – How to create a U.K. tiktok account

The cyberstalking allegations stem from VeryDarkMan’s online activities, where he is accused of using his platforms to harass, insult, and intimidate individuals. A source within the EFCC, speaking anonymously to Vanguard, elaborated that these actions may violate Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act of 2015. While the identities of the petitioners remain undisclosed, VeryDarkMan’s history of targeting celebrities like Iyabo Ojo, Tonto Dikeh, and Mercy Chinwo, as well as institutions like the EFCC and GTB, suggests a wide pool of potential complainants.
This isn’t VeryDarkMan’s first brush with cyberstalking charges. In May 2024, he was arraigned at the Federal High Court in Abuja on five counts of cyberstalking involving the Nigeria Police Force and Nollywood actresses. His outspoken nature has also led to other legal battles, including a court order in April 2025 to delete defamatory content about gospel singer Mercy Chinwo and issue a public apology.
Public Reaction: Support, Criticism, and Protests
The news of VeryDarkMan’s arrest and impending court charges has ignited a firestorm of reactions across Nigeria. Supporters have rallied under hashtags like #FREEVDMNOW and #freedvm, with protests reported outside GTB’s headquarters in Abuja. Many view VeryDarkMan as a voice for the voiceless, fearlessly exposing corruption and injustice. An X user, @king_george747, praised his strategic approach, stating, “VDM na wise man, the main evidence no dey follow VDM waka,” suggesting he may have anticipated such repercussions.
Conversely, critics argue that VeryDarkMan’s methods—often involving public shaming and unverified claims—cross ethical and legal boundaries. An X post by @princessbosslady2 challenged him to “prove it in court,” referencing his past reliance on the EFCC to address issues like Bobrisky’s alleged bribery. Others, like an unnamed commenter cited by Legit.ng, suggested that VeryDarkMan’s bold confrontations with powerful institutions require greater caution to avoid self-inflicted legal troubles.
Human rights groups, such as the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), have condemned the EFCC’s actions as “unlawful and arbitrary.” HURIWA’s National Coordinator, Emmanuel Onwubiko, accused the agency of prioritizing minor complaints over major financial crimes by high-ranking officials. The Take It Back Movement also labeled the arrest “premeditated” and criticized GTB’s alleged complicity.
What Are Cyberstalking Charges Under Nigerian Law?
To understand the gravity of the court charges VeryDarkMan faces, it’s essential to examine Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act of 2015. The Act defines cyberstalking as the use of electronic communication to harass, intimidate, or cause substantial emotional distress to another person. Offenses include sending messages that are offensive, threatening, or false with the intent to annoy or harm. Convictions can carry penalties of up to three years in prison, a fine, or both.
VeryDarkMan’s videos, which often call out individuals and institutions with strong language and allegations, may fall under this definition if deemed harassing or defamatory by a court. However, the vague nature of some provisions in the Cybercrimes Act has raised concerns about its potential misuse to silence dissent. Critics like Sowore argue that the EFCC’s pursuit of cyberstalking charges against VeryDarkMan reflects a broader trend of targeting activists and whistleblowers.
What is Next for VeryDarkMan?
As the EFCC prepares to file formal court charges, possibly as early as May 6, 2025, VeryDarkMan’s legal team is working to secure his bail. Deji Adeyanju, who was abroad at the time of the arrest, confirmed his return to Abuja to address the case. However, reports suggest that VeryDarkMan has been denied food and access to his lawyers, raising concerns about his treatment in custody.
The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications. A conviction could embolden authorities to crack down on social media influencers, while an acquittal might reinforce VeryDarkMan’s image as a fearless critic. His past legal victories, such as the dismissal of a ₦1 billion defamation suit by Falana, suggest he is no stranger to navigating the courts.
The Bigger Picture: Freedom of Speech vs. Accountability
VeryDarkMan’s arrest and the EFCC’s pursuit of cyberstalking charges highlight a critical tension in Nigeria: balancing freedom of speech with accountability for online behavior. While VeryDarkMan’s supporters view him as a champion of transparency, his detractors argue that his approach often veers into reckless defamation. The EFCC’s actions, meanwhile, raise questions about whether the agency is overstepping its mandate by targeting an influencer rather than focusing on high-profile corruption cases.
This case also underscores the growing influence of social media in shaping public discourse. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok have given figures like VeryDarkMan unprecedented reach, but they also expose them to legal risks. As Nigeria grapples with regulating online content, VeryDarkMan’s fate could set a precedent for how far critics can go before facing legal consequences.
Conclusion: A Legal Battle to Watch
The arrest of VeryDarkMan by the EFCC and the revelation of cyberstalking charges have thrust the social media influencer into the spotlight once again. As court charges loom, Nigerians are watching closely to see whether VeryDarkMan will emerge unscathed or face serious consequences for his online activism. Regardless of the outcome, this case serves as a reminder of the power—and peril—of speaking truth to power in the digital age.
For now, the focus remains on VeryDarkMan’s bail conditions and the EFCC’s next moves. Will the courts uphold the cyberstalking allegations, or will VeryDarkMan’s legal team turn the tables? Stay tuned for updates on this unfolding saga, and share your thoughts in the comments below. Is VeryDarkMan a hero, a provocateur, or something in between?
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Politics
NNPP Chieftain Reveals APC’s Approach to Kwankwaso for 2027 Vice-Presidential Slot
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Politics
Armed Police Take Over PDP Headquarters in Abuja: What’s Behind the Tension?
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Politics
Police Manhandle and Arrest PDP Staff During NEC Meeting Preparations
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


