Connect with us

Politics

VeryDarkMan’s Arrest Sparks Outrage: Why Nigerians Are Boycotting GTBank Over EFCC Drama

Published

on

VeryDarkMan, EFCC and GTBank

The VeryDarkMan, GTBank, and EFCC Saga Unraveled

In recent days, Nigeria’s social media landscape has been set ablaze by the controversial arrest of Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), an outspoken social media activist and influencer. The incident, involving GTBank and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), has ignited a firestorm of public outcry, with thousands of Nigerians threatening or actively closing their bank accounts in protest. This blog post dives deep into the unfolding drama, exploring the events leading to VDM’s detention, the allegations of complicity against GTBank, the EFCC’s role, and the massive backlash that has rocked Nigeria’s financial and social spheres. Let’s unpack this high-stakes controversy and its implications.

What Happened: The Arrest of VeryDarkMan

On May 2, 2025, VeryDarkMan visited a GTBank branch in Garki, Area 3, Abuja, to address unauthorized deductions from his mother’s account, which he claimed were falsely labeled as “loan repayments” despite no loans being taken. According to reports, VDM was detained shortly after leaving the bank premises by operatives of the EFCC, alongside his friend, Stephen Avuara, in the presence of his mother. The arrest, described by some as resembling a “kidnapping,” sparked immediate suspicion that GTBank may have tipped off the EFCC or facilitated the operation.

VDM’s lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, alleged that the activist was locked inside GTBank’s exit door for over five minutes, enabling EFCC operatives to apprehend him. Adeyanju further claimed that VDM was detained on charges of “cyberstalking,” though the EFCC has remained silent on the specific reasons for the arrest. The lack of transparency from both GTBank and the EFCC has fueled speculation that VDM’s detention was an attempt to silence his vocal criticism of powerful institutions, including the EFCC and GTBank.

The Role of GTBank: Alleged Complicity in the Arrest

GTBank, one of Nigeria’s leading financial institutions, has faced intense scrutiny for its alleged role in VDM’s arrest. Social media posts and reports suggest that the bank may have alerted the EFCC to VDM’s presence, leading to his detention. This perception was reinforced when GTBank released CCTV footage to counter claims that the arrest occurred on its premises, but the move backfired, with many Nigerians viewing it as an attempt to deflect blame.

The public’s trust in GTBank has been severely shaken, with accusations that the bank betrayed a customer who sought to resolve a legitimate grievance. VDM’s outspoken nature and history of exposing alleged corruption have made him a polarizing figure, but his supporters argue that GTBank’s actions represent a broader issue of financial institutions colluding with authorities to suppress dissent. Prominent figures, including human rights activist Omoyele Sowore, have condemned the arrest, describing it as an attempt to silence VDM for exposing EFCC corruption.

The EFCC’s Involvement: Questions of Overreach

The EFCC’s role in the saga has raised serious questions about its mandate and methods. Over 24 hours after VDM’s arrest, the agency had not disclosed the specific offense, prompting accusations of impunity and abuse of power. VDM’s legal team, led by Marvin Omorogbe, reported that the activist refused to leave his cell or meet with anyone, signaling his defiance. Additionally, VDM’s brother and friend, Kokopee, claimed they were denied access to provide food or medical aid, raising concerns about inhumane treatment.

Critics argue that the EFCC’s actions reflect a pattern of targeting outspoken individuals under vague charges like “cyberstalking.” Seun Kuti, a Nigerian Afrobeat star, suggested that VDM’s detention may be linked to his comments about an unnamed gospel artist, further muddying the waters. The EFCC’s silence, coupled with reports that it plans to file formal charges against VDM on May 5, 2025, has only intensified the public outcry.

Public Outcry: Nigerians Rally Behind VeryDarkMan

The arrest of VeryDarkMan has triggered a wave of public outcry across Nigeria, with celebrities, influencers, and ordinary citizens condemning GTBank and the EFCC. Social media platforms, particularly X, have been flooded with hashtags like #FreeVDM, #GTBankBoycott, and #EFCCAbuse, reflecting widespread anger. Prominent figures such as Primate Elijah Ayodele, Skales, Eedris Abdulkareem, and Portable have publicly criticized the arrest, with Ayodele demanding VDM’s immediate release and Skales labeling GTBank the “worst bank in Nigeria.”

The backlash has extended beyond words, with thousands of Nigerians taking concrete action by closing their GTBank accounts. According to Naija247news, over 100,000 customers have initiated account closures, putting billions of naira in deposits at risk. This mass boycott, driven by Nigeria’s tech-savvy youth, poses a significant threat to GTBank’s reputation and financial stability. Videos of angry customers, such as one identified as @joblessking001, storming GTBank branches to close accounts have gone viral, amplifying the movement.

The Boycott Movement: Why Nigerians Are Closing GTBank Accounts

The #GTBankBoycott movement has gained momentum as Nigerians express their distrust in the bank’s integrity. Fans of VeryDarkMan, known as “ratels,” have been particularly vocal, accusing GTBank of prioritizing institutional interests over customer rights. The boycott is not just about VDM’s arrest; it reflects broader frustrations with Nigeria’s banking sector, where unauthorized deductions and poor customer service are common grievances.

Social media influencer Daniel Regha called for accountability, slamming GTBank and the EFCC for their silence. Meanwhile, Isaac Fayose, brother of a former Ekiti state governor, urged Nigerians to take to the streets if the EFCC does not provide clarity by May 6, 2025. The boycott has also been fueled by personal stories, such as Skales’ account of his late mother’s financial losses due to GTBank’s alleged mismanagement.

However, not everyone supports the boycott. Onwuegbuzie Ambrose, a Nigerian commentator, argued that GTBank is profiting from the controversy, as account closures may incur fees or penalties. Despite this, the overwhelming sentiment on platforms like X suggests that the boycott is gaining traction, with posts encouraging Nigerians to withdraw their funds and switch to other banks.

The Broader Implications: Freedom of Speech and Institutional Accountability

The VeryDarkMan saga raises critical questions about freedom of expression, institutional accountability, and the role of financial institutions in Nigeria. VDM’s arrest is seen by many as an attempt to suppress his activism, which has previously targeted powerful figures and organizations. His legal team plans to sue GTBank for its alleged role in the arrest, signaling a potential landmark case that could redefine the relationship between banks, customers, and law enforcement.

The EFCC’s actions also highlight concerns about the misuse of anti-cybercrime laws to silence critics. Opinion Nigeria described GTBank’s alleged complicity as an “attack on the very foundation of civil liberties,” warning that allowing banks to become “hunting grounds” for security agencies endangers all citizens. The public’s response, from mass account closures to planned protests, underscores a growing demand for transparency and justice.

Conclusion: A Turning Point for Nigeria?

The arrest of VeryDarkMan has exposed deep-seated tensions between Nigeria’s citizens, financial institutions, and anti-graft agencies. The public outcry and subsequent account closures reflect a broader movement against perceived injustice and institutional overreach. As GTBank grapples with reputational damage and the EFCC faces accusations of impunity, the saga serves as a wake-up call for greater accountability and respect for individual rights.

For Nigerians, the #GTBankBoycott is more than a protest—it’s a statement that citizens will not tolerate betrayal or suppression. As VDM’s legal battle unfolds, the nation watches closely, hoping for justice and reform. Will GTBank and the EFCC address the public’s concerns, or will this controversy mark a turning point in Nigeria’s fight for transparency? Only time will tell.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Politics

NNPP Chieftain Reveals APC’s Approach to Kwankwaso for 2027 Vice-Presidential Slot

Published

on

APC Approaches Kwankwaso for 2027 VP Slot – NNPP Chief

In the ever-shifting landscape of Nigerian politics, the lead-up to the 2027 general elections is already marked by strategic maneuvers and unexpected alliances. A recent revelation by Ladipo Johnson, a prominent figure in the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), has shed light on the All Progressives Congress (APC)’s overtures to Rabiu Kwankwaso, the NNPP’s 2023 presidential candidate, regarding a potential vice-presidential position. This development, detailed in a video by Channels Television, underscores the complex dynamics at play as parties position themselves for the upcoming electoral battle.

The Revelation

Ladipo Johnson, in an interview with Channels Television, disclosed that members of the APC have been in contact with him, urging Kwankwaso to consider accepting a vice-presidential slot if offered by the ruling party. This revelation is significant, given Kwankwaso’s stature within the NNPP and his influence in Nigerian politics, particularly in the North. The video, which has sparked discussions across political circles, highlights the APC’s strategy to bolster its ticket ahead of the 2027 elections, possibly in response to internal and external pressures.

Context of Political Realignments

This move by the APC comes at a time when the opposition landscape is fragmented, with parties like the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party grappling with their own challenges. Recent reports indicate that the APC has been actively seeking to consolidate its position, with President Bola Tinubu receiving endorsements for a second term. The approach to Kwankwaso can be seen as part of a broader strategy to neutralize opposition threats by co-opting influential figures from rival parties.

Implications for the NNPP and Kwankwaso

For the NNPP, Johnson’s disclosure raises questions about the party’s unity and future direction. Kwankwaso, a key figure in the NNPP, has a history of navigating complex political terrains, having previously been associated with both the PDP and the APC before forming the NNPP. His potential alignment with the APC could significantly alter the opposition’s dynamics, potentially weakening the NNPP’s position while strengthening the APC’s northern base.

The Broader Political Scene

The political environment in Nigeria is characterized by fluid alliances and strategic defections, a trend that has been evident since the APC’s formation from a coalition of parties in 2013. The current scenario mirrors past instances where personal ambitions and party strategies intersect, often leading to unexpected partnerships. The NNPP’s openness to compromise, as indicated by Johnson in previous statements, suggests that the party is not immune to these pressures.

Conclusion

As Nigeria approaches the 2027 elections, the political chessboard is being set with moves that could redefine party alignments and electoral outcomes. The APC’s approach to Kwankwaso, as revealed by Johnson, is a testament to the high stakes involved and the lengths to which parties will go to secure victory. For voters and political analysts alike, these developments offer a glimpse into the intricate dance of power that will shape Nigeria’s future.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Politics

Armed Police Take Over PDP Headquarters in Abuja: What’s Behind the Tension?

Published

on

Armed Police Storm PDP HQ in Abuja Amid NEC Meeting Tension

On a tense Monday morning, June 30, 2025, the headquarters of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abuja witnessed an unusual sight: armed police officers stationed around Wadata Plaza, effectively blocking access to the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting and the Board of Trustees (BoT) gathering. This dramatic move has sparked widespread speculation about the state of Nigeria’s leading opposition party, raising questions about internal power struggles, leadership disputes, and the role of security forces in political affairs. As the situation unfolds, understanding the root causes and implications of this takeover is crucial for anyone following Nigerian politics.

The Scene at Wadata Plaza

Eyewitnesses reported a heavy police presence at the PDP secretariat, with officers guarding the gates and restricting entry to key party members, including prominent BoT figures like Maina Chiroma. The planned NEC meeting, a significant event for the party’s decision-making process, was disrupted, leaving staff and journalists baffled. Reports from reputable sources like the Daily Post Nigeria indicate that security personnel even cordoned off Dalaba Street, the road leading to the plaza, heightening the sense of uncertainty. This action suggests a coordinated effort, possibly driven by an “order from above,” as hinted by former PDP National Secretary Umar Tsauri in comments to Channels Television.

The timing couldn’t be more critical. The PDP has been grappling with internal divisions, particularly over the leadership of Acting Chairman Illiya Damagum. The BoT’s recent move to invalidate Damagum’s attempt to cancel the NEC meeting has fueled tensions, setting the stage for today’s confrontation. With the party preparing for future elections, this clash could have far-reaching consequences for its unity and influence.

Unpacking the Leadership Crisis

The PDP’s troubles trace back to a series of internal disputes that have weakened its position since losing the presidential election in 2015. Recent reports from Voice of Nigeria highlight a constitutional crisis within the party, with the NEC’s authority clashing with Damagum’s directives. This power struggle is not new; the party has faced leadership challenges and defections across various regions, as noted in an in-depth analysis by Punch Newspapers. The current standoff appears to be a culmination of these issues, with the BoT asserting its influence against Damagum’s leadership.

Adding another layer to the conflict is the speculated involvement of external political figures. Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, has been a polarizing figure in Nigerian politics. His recent infrastructure developments, as covered by The Eagle Online, signal his growing clout, leading some to wonder if his influence extends to the PDP’s internal dynamics. While no direct evidence ties Wike to the police action, his past political maneuvers suggest he could be a key player in this unfolding drama.

Why the Police Intervention?

The deployment of armed police to block a political party’s meeting raises serious questions about the role of security forces in Nigeria’s democratic process. According to the Nigeria Police Force’s official website, their mandate includes maintaining public order, but using such measures to halt a party’s internal proceedings is unusual. The lack of clarity on the “order from above” mentioned by Tsauri fuels speculation about political interference, possibly from higher government echelons or rival factions within the PDP itself.

This incident echoes past instances where security forces have been accused of meddling in political affairs, a concern that resonates with Nigerians wary of authoritarian tendencies. The PDP’s response, as it navigates this crisis, will likely shape public perception of its ability to govern effectively if it regains power.

What Lies Ahead for the PDP?

The takeover of the PDP headquarters is more than a temporary disruption; it’s a symptom of deeper issues within the party and Nigeria’s political landscape. As the opposition struggles to present a united front, the outcome of this standoff could determine its relevance in upcoming elections. Party leaders will need to address the leadership vacuum and restore trust among members and supporters.

For now, the situation remains fluid. The PDP must clarify its next steps, whether through legal action, negotiations, or a reshuffling of leadership. Observers will be watching closely to see if this event strengthens or fractures the party further. With the political stakes so high, the coming days will be pivotal.

Conclusion

The armed police takeover of the PDP headquarters in Abuja on June 30, 2025, marks a critical moment for Nigeria’s opposition. Rooted in leadership disputes and possibly influenced by external political forces, this event underscores the challenges facing the PDP as it seeks to reclaim its former dominance.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Politics

Police Manhandle and Arrest PDP Staff During NEC Meeting Preparations

Published

on

Police Arrest PDP Staff Ahead of NEC Meeting in Abuja

The political landscape in Nigeria is often marked by intense rivalries and power struggles, and recent events at the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Secretariat in Abuja have once again brought these tensions to the forefront. A video captured by Punch Newspapers shows a dramatic scene where police officers are seen manhandling and arresting Thomas Ibu, a staff member from the party’s Publicity Department, amidst an escalating leadership crisis within the PDP. This incident, occurring just before the party’s 100th National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting, underscores the fragility of political stability and the role of security forces in Nigeria’s democratic processes.

The Incident at the PDP Secretariat

On June 30, 2025, the PDP National Secretariat in Wuse Zone 5, Abuja, became the site of a significant disturbance. According to reports from Punch Newspapers, security agents, specifically police officers, surrounded and apprehended Thomas Ibu, a staff member in the Publicity Department. The video footage, which has since circulated widely, shows a tense confrontation where other PDP staff members attempted to intervene but were overpowered by the security operatives. The arrest of Ibu, whose role within the party involves managing public communications, has raised questions about the motives behind such actions and the broader implications for the party’s internal dynamics.

This incident is not isolated but rather a manifestation of deeper rifts within the PDP. The party has been grappling with a leadership crisis, particularly over the position of National Secretary. The controversy surrounding this role has been exacerbated by judicial decisions and internal power struggles, as detailed in recent reports by Tribune Online. The arrest of Ibu occurred against the backdrop of these tensions, with the party preparing for a crucial NEC meeting that could determine its future direction.

Context of the Leadership Crisis

The leadership crisis within the PDP is rooted in a dispute over the legitimacy of decisions made by the Acting National Chairman, which the Board of Trustees (BoT) has labeled as “unconstitutional and unilateral.” This conflict has led to heightened security around the PDP’s national headquarters, with access restricted and visitors subjected to thorough screening, as reported by Naija News. The ongoing saga over the National Secretary position, involving court rulings and refusals to vacate the office, has further complicated the party’s internal stability, threatening its unity and preparedness for future elections.

The arrest of Thomas Ibu can be seen as a direct outcome of these tensions. It reflects a pattern where security interventions are employed to manage or suppress dissent within political parties, a practice that has been documented in previous instances, such as the 2019 arrest of PDP members during a convention. Such actions raise concerns about the erosion of democratic processes and the potential for political disputes to escalate into physical confrontations.

Implications for Nigerian Democracy

The involvement of police in the internal affairs of political parties is a troubling development for Nigerian democracy. It suggests a scenario where law enforcement agencies are drawn into partisan conflicts, potentially undermining their neutrality and the rule of law. The United States Department of State’s recent report on Nigeria highlights systemic issues within the judicial and security sectors, including bureaucratic inertia and undue political influence, which can hamper fair and transparent governance.

This incident at the PDP Secretariat is a reminder of the challenges facing Nigeria’s political institutions. It calls for a reassessment of how security forces are deployed in political contexts and the need for stronger safeguards to protect democratic processes. The role of the media, as evidenced by Punch Newspapers’ coverage, is crucial in holding authorities accountable and ensuring that such events are not overlooked.

Conclusion

The arrest of Thomas Ibu at the PDP National Secretariat is more than just a singular event; it is a symptom of broader political tensions within Nigeria. As the country navigates its democratic path, incidents like these underscore the importance of maintaining the integrity of political institutions and the neutrality of security forces. The PDP’s leadership crisis, compounded by security interventions during the preparations for the NEC meeting, serves as a cautionary tale for other political entities and a call to action for stakeholders to prioritize dialogue and legal processes over force.

In the quest for a stable and democratic Nigeria, addressing these underlying issues is paramount. The events of June 30, 2025, at the PDP Secretariat will likely be remembered as a pivotal moment that highlights the ongoing challenges and the urgent need for reform within the nation’s political landscape.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Trending

Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading