Connect with us

Politics

VeryDarkMan’s Arrest by EFCC: Cyberstalking Charges Revealed as Court Date Looms

Published

on

VeryDarkMan's arrest by EFCC

The Controversy Surrounding VeryDarkMan’s Arrest

Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan, has become a polarizing figure in Nigeria’s social media landscape. Renowned for his outspoken criticism of public figures and institutions, VeryDarkMan has garnered a massive following while also attracting legal troubles. His recent arrest by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on May 2, 2025, has sparked widespread debate, with fans, critics, and human rights advocates weighing in. After days of speculation, the EFCC has disclosed the reason behind VeryDarkMan’s detention: allegations of cyberstalking. The agency has confirmed that court charges are imminent, marking a significant escalation in this high-profile case. This blog post delves into the details of VeryDarkMan’s arrest, the EFCC’s stated charges, and what lies ahead as the social media influencer prepares to face the law.

The Arrest: What Happened?

On May 2, 2025, VeryDarkMan was apprehended by EFCC operatives shortly after visiting a Guaranty Trust Bank (GTB) branch in Garki, Abuja, alongside his mother, Blessing Otse, and associate, Steven Avuara (aka C-Pack). The trio had gone to the bank to address suspicious deductions from Mrs. Otse’s account, which VeryDarkMan had publicly highlighted in a video posted online. According to his legal team, led by Deji Adeyanju, the arrest was dramatic and allegedly involved physical assault, blindfolding, and threats from EFCC officers, who reportedly labeled VeryDarkMan a “bandit.”

The arrest raised questions as the EFCC initially remained silent on the specific allegations. VeryDarkMan’s lawyer and supporters, including human rights activist Omoyele Sowore, condemned the detention as an attempt to silence the influencer for his relentless criticism of the EFCC and its leadership. Sowore argued that the agency lacked the legal mandate to prosecute cases like defamation or cybercrime, which are typically civil matters. Meanwhile, the whereabouts of VeryDarkMan’s mother remain unknown, adding fuel to the controversy.

EFCC Breaks Silence: Cyberstalking Charges

On May 5, 2025, the EFCC clarified the reason for VeryDarkMan’s detention. Speaking to BBC News Pidgin, EFCC spokesperson Dele Oyewale revealed that the social media critic was arrested due to multiple petitions accusing him of cyberstalking. Oyewale stated, “We arrested him to respond to a series of allegations raised against him by some petitioners. We will release him when he meets the bail conditions, and we will take the case to court as soon as possible.”

The cyberstalking allegations stem from VeryDarkMan’s online activities, where he is accused of using his platforms to harass, insult, and intimidate individuals. A source within the EFCC, speaking anonymously to Vanguard, elaborated that these actions may violate Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act of 2015. While the identities of the petitioners remain undisclosed, VeryDarkMan’s history of targeting celebrities like Iyabo Ojo, Tonto Dikeh, and Mercy Chinwo, as well as institutions like the EFCC and GTB, suggests a wide pool of potential complainants.

This isn’t VeryDarkMan’s first brush with cyberstalking charges. In May 2024, he was arraigned at the Federal High Court in Abuja on five counts of cyberstalking involving the Nigeria Police Force and Nollywood actresses. His outspoken nature has also led to other legal battles, including a court order in April 2025 to delete defamatory content about gospel singer Mercy Chinwo and issue a public apology.

Public Reaction: Support, Criticism, and Protests

The news of VeryDarkMan’s arrest and impending court charges has ignited a firestorm of reactions across Nigeria. Supporters have rallied under hashtags like #FREEVDMNOW and #freedvm, with protests reported outside GTB’s headquarters in Abuja. Many view VeryDarkMan as a voice for the voiceless, fearlessly exposing corruption and injustice. An X user, @king_george747, praised his strategic approach, stating, “VDM na wise man, the main evidence no dey follow VDM waka,” suggesting he may have anticipated such repercussions.

Conversely, critics argue that VeryDarkMan’s methods—often involving public shaming and unverified claims—cross ethical and legal boundaries. An X post by @princessbosslady2 challenged him to “prove it in court,” referencing his past reliance on the EFCC to address issues like Bobrisky’s alleged bribery. Others, like an unnamed commenter cited by Legit.ng, suggested that VeryDarkMan’s bold confrontations with powerful institutions require greater caution to avoid self-inflicted legal troubles.

Human rights groups, such as the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), have condemned the EFCC’s actions as “unlawful and arbitrary.” HURIWA’s National Coordinator, Emmanuel Onwubiko, accused the agency of prioritizing minor complaints over major financial crimes by high-ranking officials. The Take It Back Movement also labeled the arrest “premeditated” and criticized GTB’s alleged complicity.

What Are Cyberstalking Charges Under Nigerian Law?

To understand the gravity of the court charges VeryDarkMan faces, it’s essential to examine Nigeria’s Cybercrimes Act of 2015. The Act defines cyberstalking as the use of electronic communication to harass, intimidate, or cause substantial emotional distress to another person. Offenses include sending messages that are offensive, threatening, or false with the intent to annoy or harm. Convictions can carry penalties of up to three years in prison, a fine, or both.

VeryDarkMan’s videos, which often call out individuals and institutions with strong language and allegations, may fall under this definition if deemed harassing or defamatory by a court. However, the vague nature of some provisions in the Cybercrimes Act has raised concerns about its potential misuse to silence dissent. Critics like Sowore argue that the EFCC’s pursuit of cyberstalking charges against VeryDarkMan reflects a broader trend of targeting activists and whistleblowers.

What is Next for VeryDarkMan?

As the EFCC prepares to file formal court charges, possibly as early as May 6, 2025, VeryDarkMan’s legal team is working to secure his bail. Deji Adeyanju, who was abroad at the time of the arrest, confirmed his return to Abuja to address the case. However, reports suggest that VeryDarkMan has been denied food and access to his lawyers, raising concerns about his treatment in custody.

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications. A conviction could embolden authorities to crack down on social media influencers, while an acquittal might reinforce VeryDarkMan’s image as a fearless critic. His past legal victories, such as the dismissal of a ₦1 billion defamation suit by Falana, suggest he is no stranger to navigating the courts.

The Bigger Picture: Freedom of Speech vs. Accountability

VeryDarkMan’s arrest and the EFCC’s pursuit of cyberstalking charges highlight a critical tension in Nigeria: balancing freedom of speech with accountability for online behavior. While VeryDarkMan’s supporters view him as a champion of transparency, his detractors argue that his approach often veers into reckless defamation. The EFCC’s actions, meanwhile, raise questions about whether the agency is overstepping its mandate by targeting an influencer rather than focusing on high-profile corruption cases.

This case also underscores the growing influence of social media in shaping public discourse. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok have given figures like VeryDarkMan unprecedented reach, but they also expose them to legal risks. As Nigeria grapples with regulating online content, VeryDarkMan’s fate could set a precedent for how far critics can go before facing legal consequences.

Conclusion: A Legal Battle to Watch

The arrest of VeryDarkMan by the EFCC and the revelation of cyberstalking charges have thrust the social media influencer into the spotlight once again. As court charges loom, Nigerians are watching closely to see whether VeryDarkMan will emerge unscathed or face serious consequences for his online activism. Regardless of the outcome, this case serves as a reminder of the power—and peril—of speaking truth to power in the digital age.

For now, the focus remains on VeryDarkMan’s bail conditions and the EFCC’s next moves. Will the courts uphold the cyberstalking allegations, or will VeryDarkMan’s legal team turn the tables? Stay tuned for updates on this unfolding saga, and share your thoughts in the comments below. Is VeryDarkMan a hero, a provocateur, or something in between?


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Politics

NNPP Chieftain Reveals APC’s Approach to Kwankwaso for 2027 Vice-Presidential Slot

Published

on

APC Approaches Kwankwaso for 2027 VP Slot – NNPP Chief

In the ever-shifting landscape of Nigerian politics, the lead-up to the 2027 general elections is already marked by strategic maneuvers and unexpected alliances. A recent revelation by Ladipo Johnson, a prominent figure in the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), has shed light on the All Progressives Congress (APC)’s overtures to Rabiu Kwankwaso, the NNPP’s 2023 presidential candidate, regarding a potential vice-presidential position. This development, detailed in a video by Channels Television, underscores the complex dynamics at play as parties position themselves for the upcoming electoral battle.

The Revelation

Ladipo Johnson, in an interview with Channels Television, disclosed that members of the APC have been in contact with him, urging Kwankwaso to consider accepting a vice-presidential slot if offered by the ruling party. This revelation is significant, given Kwankwaso’s stature within the NNPP and his influence in Nigerian politics, particularly in the North. The video, which has sparked discussions across political circles, highlights the APC’s strategy to bolster its ticket ahead of the 2027 elections, possibly in response to internal and external pressures.

Context of Political Realignments

This move by the APC comes at a time when the opposition landscape is fragmented, with parties like the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party grappling with their own challenges. Recent reports indicate that the APC has been actively seeking to consolidate its position, with President Bola Tinubu receiving endorsements for a second term. The approach to Kwankwaso can be seen as part of a broader strategy to neutralize opposition threats by co-opting influential figures from rival parties.

Implications for the NNPP and Kwankwaso

For the NNPP, Johnson’s disclosure raises questions about the party’s unity and future direction. Kwankwaso, a key figure in the NNPP, has a history of navigating complex political terrains, having previously been associated with both the PDP and the APC before forming the NNPP. His potential alignment with the APC could significantly alter the opposition’s dynamics, potentially weakening the NNPP’s position while strengthening the APC’s northern base.

The Broader Political Scene

The political environment in Nigeria is characterized by fluid alliances and strategic defections, a trend that has been evident since the APC’s formation from a coalition of parties in 2013. The current scenario mirrors past instances where personal ambitions and party strategies intersect, often leading to unexpected partnerships. The NNPP’s openness to compromise, as indicated by Johnson in previous statements, suggests that the party is not immune to these pressures.

Conclusion

As Nigeria approaches the 2027 elections, the political chessboard is being set with moves that could redefine party alignments and electoral outcomes. The APC’s approach to Kwankwaso, as revealed by Johnson, is a testament to the high stakes involved and the lengths to which parties will go to secure victory. For voters and political analysts alike, these developments offer a glimpse into the intricate dance of power that will shape Nigeria’s future.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Politics

Armed Police Take Over PDP Headquarters in Abuja: What’s Behind the Tension?

Published

on

Armed Police Storm PDP HQ in Abuja Amid NEC Meeting Tension

On a tense Monday morning, June 30, 2025, the headquarters of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Abuja witnessed an unusual sight: armed police officers stationed around Wadata Plaza, effectively blocking access to the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting and the Board of Trustees (BoT) gathering. This dramatic move has sparked widespread speculation about the state of Nigeria’s leading opposition party, raising questions about internal power struggles, leadership disputes, and the role of security forces in political affairs. As the situation unfolds, understanding the root causes and implications of this takeover is crucial for anyone following Nigerian politics.

The Scene at Wadata Plaza

Eyewitnesses reported a heavy police presence at the PDP secretariat, with officers guarding the gates and restricting entry to key party members, including prominent BoT figures like Maina Chiroma. The planned NEC meeting, a significant event for the party’s decision-making process, was disrupted, leaving staff and journalists baffled. Reports from reputable sources like the Daily Post Nigeria indicate that security personnel even cordoned off Dalaba Street, the road leading to the plaza, heightening the sense of uncertainty. This action suggests a coordinated effort, possibly driven by an “order from above,” as hinted by former PDP National Secretary Umar Tsauri in comments to Channels Television.

The timing couldn’t be more critical. The PDP has been grappling with internal divisions, particularly over the leadership of Acting Chairman Illiya Damagum. The BoT’s recent move to invalidate Damagum’s attempt to cancel the NEC meeting has fueled tensions, setting the stage for today’s confrontation. With the party preparing for future elections, this clash could have far-reaching consequences for its unity and influence.

Unpacking the Leadership Crisis

The PDP’s troubles trace back to a series of internal disputes that have weakened its position since losing the presidential election in 2015. Recent reports from Voice of Nigeria highlight a constitutional crisis within the party, with the NEC’s authority clashing with Damagum’s directives. This power struggle is not new; the party has faced leadership challenges and defections across various regions, as noted in an in-depth analysis by Punch Newspapers. The current standoff appears to be a culmination of these issues, with the BoT asserting its influence against Damagum’s leadership.

Adding another layer to the conflict is the speculated involvement of external political figures. Nyesom Wike, the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, has been a polarizing figure in Nigerian politics. His recent infrastructure developments, as covered by The Eagle Online, signal his growing clout, leading some to wonder if his influence extends to the PDP’s internal dynamics. While no direct evidence ties Wike to the police action, his past political maneuvers suggest he could be a key player in this unfolding drama.

Why the Police Intervention?

The deployment of armed police to block a political party’s meeting raises serious questions about the role of security forces in Nigeria’s democratic process. According to the Nigeria Police Force’s official website, their mandate includes maintaining public order, but using such measures to halt a party’s internal proceedings is unusual. The lack of clarity on the “order from above” mentioned by Tsauri fuels speculation about political interference, possibly from higher government echelons or rival factions within the PDP itself.

This incident echoes past instances where security forces have been accused of meddling in political affairs, a concern that resonates with Nigerians wary of authoritarian tendencies. The PDP’s response, as it navigates this crisis, will likely shape public perception of its ability to govern effectively if it regains power.

What Lies Ahead for the PDP?

The takeover of the PDP headquarters is more than a temporary disruption; it’s a symptom of deeper issues within the party and Nigeria’s political landscape. As the opposition struggles to present a united front, the outcome of this standoff could determine its relevance in upcoming elections. Party leaders will need to address the leadership vacuum and restore trust among members and supporters.

For now, the situation remains fluid. The PDP must clarify its next steps, whether through legal action, negotiations, or a reshuffling of leadership. Observers will be watching closely to see if this event strengthens or fractures the party further. With the political stakes so high, the coming days will be pivotal.

Conclusion

The armed police takeover of the PDP headquarters in Abuja on June 30, 2025, marks a critical moment for Nigeria’s opposition. Rooted in leadership disputes and possibly influenced by external political forces, this event underscores the challenges facing the PDP as it seeks to reclaim its former dominance.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Politics

Police Manhandle and Arrest PDP Staff During NEC Meeting Preparations

Published

on

Police Arrest PDP Staff Ahead of NEC Meeting in Abuja

The political landscape in Nigeria is often marked by intense rivalries and power struggles, and recent events at the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Secretariat in Abuja have once again brought these tensions to the forefront. A video captured by Punch Newspapers shows a dramatic scene where police officers are seen manhandling and arresting Thomas Ibu, a staff member from the party’s Publicity Department, amidst an escalating leadership crisis within the PDP. This incident, occurring just before the party’s 100th National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting, underscores the fragility of political stability and the role of security forces in Nigeria’s democratic processes.

The Incident at the PDP Secretariat

On June 30, 2025, the PDP National Secretariat in Wuse Zone 5, Abuja, became the site of a significant disturbance. According to reports from Punch Newspapers, security agents, specifically police officers, surrounded and apprehended Thomas Ibu, a staff member in the Publicity Department. The video footage, which has since circulated widely, shows a tense confrontation where other PDP staff members attempted to intervene but were overpowered by the security operatives. The arrest of Ibu, whose role within the party involves managing public communications, has raised questions about the motives behind such actions and the broader implications for the party’s internal dynamics.

This incident is not isolated but rather a manifestation of deeper rifts within the PDP. The party has been grappling with a leadership crisis, particularly over the position of National Secretary. The controversy surrounding this role has been exacerbated by judicial decisions and internal power struggles, as detailed in recent reports by Tribune Online. The arrest of Ibu occurred against the backdrop of these tensions, with the party preparing for a crucial NEC meeting that could determine its future direction.

Context of the Leadership Crisis

The leadership crisis within the PDP is rooted in a dispute over the legitimacy of decisions made by the Acting National Chairman, which the Board of Trustees (BoT) has labeled as “unconstitutional and unilateral.” This conflict has led to heightened security around the PDP’s national headquarters, with access restricted and visitors subjected to thorough screening, as reported by Naija News. The ongoing saga over the National Secretary position, involving court rulings and refusals to vacate the office, has further complicated the party’s internal stability, threatening its unity and preparedness for future elections.

The arrest of Thomas Ibu can be seen as a direct outcome of these tensions. It reflects a pattern where security interventions are employed to manage or suppress dissent within political parties, a practice that has been documented in previous instances, such as the 2019 arrest of PDP members during a convention. Such actions raise concerns about the erosion of democratic processes and the potential for political disputes to escalate into physical confrontations.

Implications for Nigerian Democracy

The involvement of police in the internal affairs of political parties is a troubling development for Nigerian democracy. It suggests a scenario where law enforcement agencies are drawn into partisan conflicts, potentially undermining their neutrality and the rule of law. The United States Department of State’s recent report on Nigeria highlights systemic issues within the judicial and security sectors, including bureaucratic inertia and undue political influence, which can hamper fair and transparent governance.

This incident at the PDP Secretariat is a reminder of the challenges facing Nigeria’s political institutions. It calls for a reassessment of how security forces are deployed in political contexts and the need for stronger safeguards to protect democratic processes. The role of the media, as evidenced by Punch Newspapers’ coverage, is crucial in holding authorities accountable and ensuring that such events are not overlooked.

Conclusion

The arrest of Thomas Ibu at the PDP National Secretariat is more than just a singular event; it is a symptom of broader political tensions within Nigeria. As the country navigates its democratic path, incidents like these underscore the importance of maintaining the integrity of political institutions and the neutrality of security forces. The PDP’s leadership crisis, compounded by security interventions during the preparations for the NEC meeting, serves as a cautionary tale for other political entities and a call to action for stakeholders to prioritize dialogue and legal processes over force.

In the quest for a stable and democratic Nigeria, addressing these underlying issues is paramount. The events of June 30, 2025, at the PDP Secretariat will likely be remembered as a pivotal moment that highlights the ongoing challenges and the urgent need for reform within the nation’s political landscape.


Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Trending

Discover more from Daily Media NG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading