Information
VeryDarkMan vs. NAFDAC: Unraveling the Onitsha Drug Market Controversy and Its Impact on Traders
Post Links
The ongoing conflict between Nigerian social media activist Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), and the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC) has sparked widespread debate across Nigeria. At the heart of this controversy is the plight of traders at the Onitsha Bridge Head Drug Market, one of Africa’s largest pharmaceutical hubs, whose shops were locked up following NAFDAC’s enforcement operations targeting counterfeit drugs.
VDM’s vocal allegations of extortion by NAFDAC officials, coupled with the agency’s decision to report him to security agencies for incitement, have raised questions about regulatory overreach, the livelihoods of traders, and freedom of speech. Let us delve into the latest developments, the implications for the Onitsha drug sellers, and the broader societal impact of this clash.
UK Tiktok Creation Blueprint with Monetization tips and Coaching – How to create a U.K. tiktok account

The Background: NAFDAC’s Crackdown on Onitsha Drug Market
In February 2025, NAFDAC launched a nationwide campaign to combat the proliferation of counterfeit, substandard, and banned drugs in Nigeria’s open drug markets, including Idumota (Lagos), Ariaria (Aba), and the Onitsha Bridge Head Market in Anambra State. The agency’s operations, conducted under the authority of the Office of the National Security Adviser, resulted in the seizure and destruction of drugs valued at over ₦1 trillion.
At Onitsha, NAFDAC shut down sections of the market, citing non-compliance with Good Storage and Distribution Practices and the presence of banned narcotics. The agency reported recovering rifles, live ammunition, and other weapons, describing the market as a hub for dangerous activities that threaten public health.
The market was partially reopened on March 9, 2025, with over 2,500 compliant traders resuming business in 3,500 shops. However, NAFDAC stated that a minority of traders, allegedly linked to banned substances, resisted compliance and fueled unrest. This set the stage for the entry of VeryDarkMan, whose activism brought the traders’ grievances into the public spotlight.
VeryDarkMan’s Allegations Against NAFDAC
VeryDarkMan, a prominent social media influencer known for his outspoken critiques of systemic corruption, visited the Onitsha drug market in May 2025 following complaints from traders. In a viral video broadcast live from Ogbogwu Market, VDM accused NAFDAC of extorting traders by demanding ₦700,000 per shop owner to reopen their locked shops. He claimed that the agency initially set the fee at ₦500,000, only to increase it after two weeks, causing financial strain for traders who rely on daily earnings for survival.
VDM stated that he had never visited Onitsha before but felt compelled to act due to the alleged “extortion and stealing” by NAFDAC officials. The activist’s videos, which showed him amidst protesting traders, gained significant traction on social media, amplifying the traders’ plight. Many shop owners corroborated VDM’s claims, asserting that they were not involved in selling fake drugs but were being unfairly penalized.
The traders’ protests, which began as early as March 2025, highlighted their frustration with the prolonged closure of their shops, allegations of looting by NAFDAC officials, and the lack of transparency in the agency’s operations. Placards during these protests read, “We are not merchants of death” and “NAFDAC, stop the intimidation now,” reflecting the traders’ desperation to reclaim their livelihoods.
NAFDAC’s Response and Reporting VeryDarkMan to Security Agencies
NAFDAC swiftly responded to VeryDarkMan’s allegations, dismissing them as “false and inciting.” The agency’s Director General, Prof. Mojisola Adeyeye, stated on May 26, 2025, warning that VDM’s actions could violate Nigeria’s Cybercrime Act. NAFDAC accused the influencer of colluding with “fake drug merchants” to incite public unrest and undermine its regulatory authority.
The agency emphasized that its operations were intelligence-driven and aimed at protecting public health by eliminating harmful drugs from circulation. In a significant escalation, NAFDAC reported VeryDarkMan to security agencies for investigation into possible violations of the Cybercrime Act, citing his videos as “misleading” and capable of inciting public disobedience. The agency also clarified that its enforcement actions were conducted legally and that compliant traders had resumed operations, while those resisting were allegedly tied to banned narcotics. This move has sparked debates about freedom of expression and whether NAFDAC is attempting to silence dissent to protect its reputation.
The Plight of Onitsha Drug Sellers
The Onitsha drug market, a critical economic hub in Anambra State, supports thousands of traders’ livelihoods, with many shop owners relying on daily sales to sustain their families. The closure of shops since February 2025 has caused significant economic hardship, with traders reporting losses of goods and income. The allegations of a ₦700,000 reopening fee have further exacerbated their plight, as many cannot afford such a sum. Traders have also claimed that NAFDAC officials seized genuine registered drugs during the raids, with some estimating losses equivalent to “over 60 trailer loads” of products.
The traders’ protests in March 2025, backed by groups like the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), called for greater transparency from NAFDAC. They questioned the agency’s midnight raids, the blocking of CCTV cameras, and the lack of evidence proving that confiscated drugs were fake. IPOB suggested that NAFDAC establish permanent offices in drug markets to ensure proper regulation rather than resorting to aggressive tactics.
Prominent figures, including the Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate Peter Obi, have weighed in on the issue. Obi criticized NAFDAC’s alleged ₦700,000 fee, urging the agency to reopen the shops and scrap the charge to alleviate the traders’ suffering. His intervention underscores the political and social sensitivity of the issue, as the Onitsha market is a vital economic artery in Nigeria’s southeast.
Implications of the NAFDAC-VDM Clash
The confrontation between VeryDarkMan and NAFDAC has far-reaching implications for both the Onitsha drug sellers and Nigeria’s broader regulatory and social landscape:
- Trader Livelihoods at Stake
The prolonged closure of shops and the alleged extortion have pushed many traders to the brink of economic ruin. The Onitsha drug market is not just a commercial hub but a lifeline for thousands of families. The financial burden of reopening fees, coupled with the loss of goods, threatens to destabilize the local economy and erode trust in regulatory institutions. - Freedom of Speech vs. Regulatory Authority
NAFDAC’s decision to report VeryDarkMan to security agencies raises concerns about the balance between free speech and regulatory enforcement. While the agency has a mandate to protect public health, critics argue that targeting VDM for his activism could set a precedent for silencing whistleblowers and activists who challenge institutional misconduct. The invocation of the Cybercrime Act in this context has sparked debates about its potential misuse to suppress dissent. - Public Trust in NAFDAC
The allegations of extortion and lack of transparency have damaged NAFDAC’s credibility. The agency’s failure to address the ₦700,000 fee allegations directly, coupled with its aggressive response to VDM, has fueled public skepticism. Restoring trust will require clear communication, accountability, and a commitment to fair regulatory practices. - Counterfeit Drugs and Public Health
NAFDAC’s crackdown highlights the persistent challenge of counterfeit drugs in Nigeria, which pose a grave risk to public health. However, the agency’s approach—shutting down entire markets and imposing hefty fees—has been criticized as heavy-handed. A more collaborative and transparent strategy, as suggested by IPOB, could address the issue without alienating legitimate traders. - The Role of Social Media Activism
VeryDarkMan’s intervention demonstrates the power of social media in amplifying marginalized voices. His ability to mobilize public attention to the Onitsha drug sellers’ plight underscores the growing influence of digital activism in holding institutions accountable. However, it also highlights the risks activists face when challenging powerful agencies.
Broader Context: VeryDarkMan’s History of Activism
This is not the first time VeryDarkMan has faced legal repercussions for his activism. In May 2025, he was arrested by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in Abuja over allegations of cyberstalking and money laundering, though he was later released. Protesters rallied for his release, chanting “#FreeVDM” and describing him as the “masses’ liberator.” These incidents highlight VDM’s polarizing yet influential role in Nigerian society, where he is both celebrated as a voice for the voiceless and criticized for his confrontational style.
Conclusion
The clash between VeryDarkMan and NAFDAC over the Onitsha drug market controversy encapsulates broader tensions in Nigeria between regulatory enforcement and economic survival, free speech and institutional authority, and public health and transparency. The plight of the Onitsha drug sellers, caught in the crossfire of NAFDAC’s crackdown and VDM’s activism, underscores the need for a balanced approach that protects public health without destroying traders’ livelihoods.
As the investigation into VDM’s alleged incitement unfolds, the nation watches closely to see whether this saga will lead to meaningful reforms or further entrench divisions. For now, the Onitsha drug market remains a flashpoint, with VeryDarkMan’s bold accusations and NAFDAC’s stern response shaping public discourse. The resolution of this conflict could set a precedent for how Nigeria navigates the complex interplay of regulation, activism, and economic justice.
What are your thoughts on the VeryDarkMan-NAFDAC controversy? Should NAFDAC adopt a more transparent approach to its operations, or is the agency justified in its crackdown on the Onitsha drug market? Share your views in the comments below, and stay tuned for updates on this unfolding story.
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Information
How to Bet Responsibly on Sports Events: A Comprehensive Guide
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Information
Nigeria Driver’s License Price Hike Starts Tomorrow: What You Need to Know
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Information
Tragic Billboard Collapse in Aba: Lessons Learned and Safety Measures to Prevent Future Disasters
Discover more from Daily Media NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

